|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]贾小龙. 《侵权责任法》互联网专条之法理基础研究——基于127份网络服务提供者商标侵权责任裁判的实证分析[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(6):555-561.
 Jia Xiaolong. Legal Basis of the Internet Special Provision in Chinese Tort Law —Empirical Study Based on 127 Written Judgments on Trademark[J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2017,(6):555-561.
点击复制

 《侵权责任法》互联网专条之法理基础研究——基于127份网络服务提供者商标侵权责任裁判的实证分析()
分享到:

《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1008-4339/CN:12-1290/c]

卷:
期数:
2017年6期
页码:
555-561
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2017-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Legal Basis of the Internet Special Provision in Chinese Tort Law

—Empirical Study Based on 127 Written Judgments on Trademark
作者:
 贾小龙
 兰州理工大学法学院, 兰州 730050
Author(s):
 Jia Xiaolong
 School of Law, Lan Zhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
关键词:
 网络服务提供者 连带责任 体系解释 知道 无意思联络的数人侵权
Keywords:
 internet service provider joint liability systematic interpretation know multiperson tort without contact
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 将网络服务提供者侵权连带责任的法理基础定位在共同侵权,不符合《侵权责任法》数人侵权规则体系下共同侵权的主观过错仅应包含共同故意的立法本意。从网络用户侵权行为的连续性、网络服务提供者参与侵权的阶段性、损害结果的同一性以及网络服务提供者具有独立排除网络侵权的技术能力等方面可知,网络服务提供者侵权连带责任的法理基础应在于无意思联络的数人侵权。以无意思联络的数人侵权作为网络服务提供者连带责任的法理基础,有利于解释该法设互联网专条的必要性、揭示该条立法原意并对其各款规定做出内在一致的整体解释,从而彰显互联网专条规定的应有价值,也更契合网络侵权的实际和网络侵权司法实务的说理路径。
Abstract:
 Located the legal basis of internet service provider joint liability in joint tort does not correspond with the real legislative intention that the subjective fault of joint tort should only include joint intent according to the multiperson tort rule system of tort law. But the continuity of the tort committed by internet user, the phased characteristics of internet service provider involved in internet tort, the identity of damage and the technological ability possessed by the internet service provider of independently excluding internet tort demonstrate that the legal basis of internet special provision on tort law should be located in the rule of multiperson tort without contact. Accordingly, making multiperson tort without contact as the legal basis of internet service provider joint liability is beneficial to interpret the necessity of the internet special provision, bringing to light its legislative intention and concluding an inherently and consistently integral interpretation to this special provision. Thus could completely outstanding the due or truly value of the special provision, also could be more coincident with the reality of internet tort and the decision approach of internet tort judicial practice.

相似文献/References:

[1]李健,张吉辉.水足迹视角下区域水资源灾变的灰色拓扑预测[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):1.
[2]李秀芳,景珮. 基于多目标规划的最优再保险策略[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):5.
[3]高素英,郝晓华,刘建朝,等. 滨海新区城市进化评价研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):15.
[4]郭俊华. 京津冀文化消费水平实证研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):21.
[5]赵黎明,卢 珊. 科技企业孵化器与创投合作绩效研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):26.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):26.
[6]张念木,胡连兴,郭建欣. 水电工程后评价的综合评价方法研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):31.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):31.
[7]姜姣娇,赵 涛. 电信业集团客户CRM价值评估模型设计与应用[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):41.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):41.
[8]李义丹,周志刚. 人的全面发展观与人的科学发展观关系研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):46.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):46.
[9]王 坤. 新农村建设中的非物质文化遗产之命运探析——以南乡义成永画店为例[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):50.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):50.
[10]段志成,陈 通,杨秋波. 灾后基础设施重建中公众参与的行为框架及路径分析[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):54.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(6):54.

更新日期/Last Update: