|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]佟瑞鹏,翟存利. 社区封闭到开放过程的风险演化研究 ——基于耗散结构理论[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(5):426-433.
 Tong Ruipeng,Zhai Cunli. A Study on theRiskEvolution of Community Gated to UnGated —Based on Dissipative Structure Theory [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2017,(5):426-433.
点击复制

 社区封闭到开放过程的风险演化研究 ——基于耗散结构理论
()
分享到:

《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1008-4339/CN:12-1290/c]

卷:
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
426-433
栏目:
社会学
出版日期:
2017-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A Study on theRiskEvolution of Community Gated to UnGated —Based on Dissipative Structure Theory


作者:
 佟瑞鹏 翟存利
 

(中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院, 北京 100083)
Author(s):
 Tong Ruipeng Zhai Cunli
 (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
关键词:
 关键词: 开放社区 封闭社区 耗散结构 社区风险
Keywords:
 Keywords: ungated community gated community dissipative structure community risk entropy
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 摘要: 为了研究社区由封闭到开放的风险演化,基于耗散结构理论,分析影响社区风险的正负熵因素,构建了社区风险熵变模型。应用熵值法量化社区风险的正负熵,根据Brusselator模型得出社区系统是否为耗散结构的判别依据,并选取具有代表性的社区实例进行风险演化分析。结果表明, 封闭社区和半开放社区风险变化比较稳定有序,社区安全系数较高;完全开放社区风险变化混乱无序,社区安全系数较低。

Abstract:
 Abstract: In order to compare the risk differences between the gated community and the ungated community, the community risk entropy change model was developed based on dissipative structure theory. And then, applying the entropy method, the positive and negative entropy of community risks were quantified. Further, whether the community system was a dissipative structure or not was judged by Brusselator model. Finally, three typical communities were selected to carry out risk evolution analysis. It showed that the complete ungated community was the most chaotic and disordered among the three communities. In other words, the safety factor was the lowest of complete ungated community.

相似文献/References:

[1]李健,张吉辉.水足迹视角下区域水资源灾变的灰色拓扑预测[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):1.
[2]李秀芳,景珮. 基于多目标规划的最优再保险策略[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):5.
[3]高素英,郝晓华,刘建朝,等. 滨海新区城市进化评价研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):15.
[4]郭俊华. 京津冀文化消费水平实证研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):21.
[5]赵黎明,卢 珊. 科技企业孵化器与创投合作绩效研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):26.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):26.
[6]张念木,胡连兴,郭建欣. 水电工程后评价的综合评价方法研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):31.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):31.
[7]姜姣娇,赵 涛. 电信业集团客户CRM价值评估模型设计与应用[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):41.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):41.
[8]李义丹,周志刚. 人的全面发展观与人的科学发展观关系研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):46.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):46.
[9]王 坤. 新农村建设中的非物质文化遗产之命运探析——以南乡义成永画店为例[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):50.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):50.
[10]段志成,陈 通,杨秋波. 灾后基础设施重建中公众参与的行为框架及路径分析[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(1):54.
 [J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Science),2013,(5):54.

更新日期/Last Update: